You've heard of mentorship in science, but what about sponsorship? –

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Christine Parsons is an associate professor and director of the Interacting Minds Centre, School of Culture and Society and department of clinical medicine at Aarhus University, Denmark.
You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar
Pat O’Connor is an emeritus professor of sociology and social policy at the University of Limerick, Ireland, and a visiting professor at the Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Ireland.
You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar
You have full access to this article via your institution.

Academic sponsors can help junior scientists ascend the career ladder in ways that mentors cannot.Credit: Getty
We all recognize the benefits of mentorship, having someone to guide us through the complex world of academia and other sectors. Mentors provide advice and insights from their own careers and experiences. And outstanding mentorship is celebrated. Nature launched an award for this in 2005.
But less discussed are the benefits of sponsorship: a type of active career support that relies on a senior researcher’s willingness to leverage their influence, networks or position to actively promote a junior colleague’s career advancement. Mentors provide advice and support to help a junior person to fit in; sponsors create opportunities and visibility to help junior researchers move up. Mentors form one-to-one relationships, but sponsors help to form connections and create tailored opportunities to move the person whom they have sponsored up the career ladder. Sponsorship requires advocacy on behalf of the junior researcher; mentorship does not.
Examples of sponsorship in academia can range from introducing a junior researcher to well-established colleagues, inviting them to a grant-application meeting, including them on a prestigious conference panel or mentioning them in a faculty meeting.
Sponsorship often comprises small but career-making actions: one example is inviting a PhD student to a coffee meeting with a visiting professor. These small actions can accumulate, helping to accelerate the careers of some researchers, even when formal mentorship is equally available to all.
By contrast, mentorship might involve giving advice on how to present yourself at a conference; how to deal with the conflicting demands of teaching and research; and providing career guidance, reassurance and encouragement.
Anyone, but particularly those from under-represented groups and people who might not understand academic culture or know how the system works, can benefit from mentorship. Advice, information and emotional support are all of value, but these individuals are likely to benefit even more from the career acceleration that sponsorship can provide.

Mentoring resources
Unlike mentoring, sponsorship is not easy to standardize or structure. Mentors can be given guidelines on how to mentor, agree on goals and expectations, meet at regular intervals and listen to the needs of the trainee. But sponsorship can’t be outlined in the same way. The sponsored candidate’s performance reflects on the sponsor. If a candidate performs well, glory is reflected on the sponsor. If a candidate performs poorly, it can damage the sponsor’s reputation. And sponsors themselves belong to a select group: those with academic or organizational power, heads of departments, faculty deans, well-funded, influential researchers and senior academics.
Universities have focused on mentorship schemes and training for women and members of minority groups because these are intuitive, appealing solutions for diversity, equity and inclusion issues. These schemes often assume that these trainees need more help than others. For example, women might be assumed to have insufficient confidence. Mentorship schemes therefore focus on increasing confidence in women: a perceived way to ‘fix the target’ and ensure inclusion goals are addressed. But there is evidence that women — as an example of an under-represented group in science — already receive the same amount of mentoring (and occasionally more) than men in many workplaces1. It is sponsorship that is missing2 — and the lack of it could be perpetuating gender inequalities at the highest levels of academia.
Why might women receive less sponsorship than men? Globally, men occupy more university leadership and senior positions than women. Generally, people tend to seek out and support candidates who are similar to themselves3. The dominance of white, able-bodied men at the highest levels of academia means that sponsorship is plausibly more accessible for white, able-bodied junior men. And research by one of us (P. O’C.) suggests that male junior researchers are more aware of sponsorship2 and of tactics to access it. They are more comfortable with power and its importance, and will often perform favours, such as undertaking routine parts of the potential sponsor’s job. Creating indebtedness and deepening trust in these ways is an effective tactic to attain sponsorship.
Many women can be uneasy about receiving sponsorship: they might want to feel that their achievements are a result of their hard work. Both male and female sponsors, too, can feel uneasy about acknowledging their role in advancing the careers of their trainees, although they might be comfortable with reframing sponsorship as ‘talent management’.
Those in powerful positions can create change by consciously recognizing and reflecting on their sponsorship practices. Have you noticed that you identify with some junior researchers, but not others? Do you create different opportunities to interact informally with some of them, to build trust in them, and, ultimately, to sponsor them? Are these practices likely to benefit the organization in the future — or are they perpetuating the status quo?
What if discretionary payments to you as a manager were based on whether you sponsored two under-represented junior researchers every year? What would you need to change to achieve this target? When you next update your CV and write down the names of those you have mentored, you could also name those you have sponsored. By becoming aware of your practices, you can not only change them, but also contribute to a culture in which senior managers hold each other to account.
We think it is also important for early-career researchers to be aware of hidden processes, such as sponsorship, that can make career advancement easier for some. You might feel that you will benefit from mentorship. Indeed, seeking out a mentor might help you to find a sponsor. But you are better armed to find effective career support if you understand the difference between the two.
Of equal importance, senior academics need to understand the difference between mentorship and sponsorship and to recognize that they can promote diversity through their sponsorship relationships.
This is an article from the Nature Careers Community, a place for Nature readers to share their professional experiences and advice. Guest posts are encouraged.
Ibarra, H., Carter, N. M. & Silva, C. Harv. Bus. Rev. 88, 80–85 (2010).
PubMed  Google Scholar 
O’Connor, P. et al. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 39, 764–777 (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 
Van Den Brink, M. & Benschop, Y. Organization 19, 507–524 (2012).
Article  Google Scholar 
Download references
Hiring and being hired: faculty members share their stories
Mentoring during the COVID-19 pandemic
Teaching a difficult subject? Try gamifying your class
How a failed eczema treatment triggered an interest in traditional medicine
Career Q&A
How I break bad news on grant applications
Career Column
How I turn greenhouse gas from landfill sites into carbon-neutral fuel
Why Dutch universities are stepping up support for academics facing threats and intimidation
Career Q&A
Young physicists say ethics rules are being ignored
How coaching could help tackle toxic research cultures
Career Q&A
How I break bad news on grant applications
Career Column
Confused by open-access policies? These tools can help
Technology Feature
China is opening up after 3 years — what does it mean for research?
Technische Universität Dresden (TU Dresden)
01069 Dresden, Germany
The University of British Columbia (UBC)
Vancouver, Canada
Jülich Research Centre (FZJ)
Jülich, Germany
Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research GmbH (GSI)
Darmstadt, Germany
You have full access to this article via your institution.

Hiring and being hired: faculty members share their stories
Mentoring during the COVID-19 pandemic
Teaching a difficult subject? Try gamifying your class
An essential round-up of science news, opinion and analysis, delivered to your inbox every weekday.
Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.
Nature (Nature) ISSN 1476-4687 (online) ISSN 0028-0836 (print)
© 2023 Springer Nature Limited


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *